🎯 Quick Overview
Trailer
- Director: Ted Kotcheff
- Genre: Comedy, Crime, Satire
- Release year: 1977
- Runtime (length): 1h 35min
- IMDb rating: 6.4/10 (6.7K votes)
- Rotten Tomatoes: 58%
😅 Plot Summary – Badly Explained
When a fancy executive gets fired, he and his wife decide robbing places is way easier than finding another job, accidentally becoming surprisingly good criminals.
🍿 Fun with Dick and Jane: Detailed Plot Synopsis
A Comfortable Life Interrupted
Dick Harper is a successful aerospace executive living the American dream with his wife, Jane, and their young son in a comfortable suburban home. They enjoy a high standard of living, complete with a maid, and are in the process of building a swimming pool. Their seemingly stable world is abruptly shattered when Dick is unexpectedly fired from his job due to company cutbacks. This leaves the family not only without Dick’s substantial income but also saddled with significant debt, particularly on their new house.

Facing Financial Ruin
Dick and Jane initially attempt to maintain appearances and cut back expenses, but their financial situation rapidly deteriorates. Dick struggles to find new employment in a tough market, and Jane’s attempts to find work are also unsuccessful. As debts mount and possessions are repossessed, the couple is forced to navigate the complexities and indignities of the unemployment and welfare systems, including applying for food stamps. Their desperation grows as they realize their comfortable life is slipping away.

A Desperate Turn to Crime
While attempting to secure a loan, Dick and Jane are caught in the middle of a bank robbery. In the confusion, Jane accidentally makes off with some of the stolen money. This unexpected brush with crime sparks a desperate idea: they could resort to robbery to solve their financial woes. Their initial attempts at stick-ups are comically inept, showcasing their lack of experience and awkwardness in the criminal underworld. Despite fumbling through early heists, the couple begins to taste success and realizes they might be able to maintain their lifestyle through illegal means.

Learning the Ropes
As Dick and Jane continue their crime spree, targeting various businesses they deem deserving targets like the telephone company or loan sharks, they become more skilled and confident. They develop techniques for disguises and getaways, transitioning from clumsy amateurs to a surprisingly effective team. The thrill and financial gain from their heists allow them to start rebuilding their life, paying off debts, and even completing their swimming pool. They begin to enjoy their illicit activities, blurring the lines between survival and a taste for the excitement and rewards of crime.

⚠️ Spoilers and Ending Explained
🎬 Cast & Characters
- Dick Harper (George Segal): A successful aerospace executive whose sudden unemployment leads him and his wife to resort to armed robbery.
- Jane Harper (Jane Fonda): Dick’s wife who adapts resourceful ways to cope with their financial ruin and ultimately joins her husband in committing crimes.
- Charlie Blanchard (Ed McMahon): Dick’s smarmy, self-serving boss whose decision to fire him triggers the Harpers’ descent into desperation and crime.
- Raoul Esteban (Hank Garcia): A welfare recipient encountered by Dick, representing the stark contrast to the Harpers’ former privileged life and their struggle with the social system.
- Jane’s Father (John Dehner): Jane’s wealthy, conservative father who refuses financial assistance and lectures the couple on the virtues of hardship.
💬 Memorable Quotes
- Dick Harper: “No kidding Charlie, . . You’re really firing me! ??” – Said in disbelief and shock when his boss, Charlie Blanchard, abruptly fires him.
- Jane Harper: “Interesting that the only two jobs you think I am qualified for are a secretary and a prostitute.” – Said with exasperation to Dick while discussing her limited job prospects after his firing.
- Jane Harper: “That’s illegal!” – Exclaimed in outrage upon being quoted an exorbitant interest rate for a loan after losing their income.
- Income Maintenance Technician: “No thanks. I had a Big Mac…And a Coke.” – Politely declined an offer of steak and champagne while visiting the Harpers’ home to assess their eligibility for food stamps.
- Jane Harper: “We’re like a couple of Robin Hoods!” – Said excitedly to Dick, trying to rationalize their decision to turn to robbery by suggesting they are taking from the corrupt.
💰Box Office
- Budget: $3,000,000
- Domestic Gross: $22,800,000
- Worldwide Gross: $22,800,000
💥 Fun with Dick and Jane Reviews
Personal Review
I first caught ‘Fun with Dick and Jane’ late one night on cable, and it totally hooked me! George Segal and Jane Fonda together? Who knew they’d be so great as a suburban couple turned stick-up artists? I loved watching their characters go from being totally clueless at robbing places to actually getting a bit good at it. The scene where Dick tries to rob the record store and ends up just awkwardly talking about music with the clerk always makes me laugh out loud. And their first few attempts are just pure comedic gold, showing how desperate they are but in a really funny way. It’s got this cool 70s vibe, and honestly, seeing them stick it to the greedy corporations felt really satisfying. It’s not a deep philosophical film, but it’s just plain fun. It’s one of those movies that makes you feel like maybe you could get away with something, even if you know you absolutely couldn’t. Highly recommend it for a fun, slightly rebellious watch!
- Who would enjoy:
- “Fans of satirical comedies”
- “Viewers interested in 1970s cinema”
- “Fans of George Segal and Jane Fonda”
- “Those who enjoy crime caper films with a comedic twist”
- “People interested in social commentary through humor”
- Content warnings ⚠:
- “Dated humor and stereotypes (racial, homophobic, transphobic)”
- “Themes of financial desperation and crime”
- “Mild language”
Professional Reviews
- Original: “”Fun with Dick and Jane” cleverly skewers the American Dream and corporate hypocrisy through the misadventures of a newly unemployed suburban couple. George Segal and Jane Fonda are perfectly cast, navigating their characters’ desperate descent into crime with charm and surprising comedic timing. While some humor feels dated, the film’s core satire on financial insecurity remains surprisingly relevant. It’s an entertaining time capsule that works largely due to its lead performances and sharp, albeit sometimes uneven, social commentary.
- Original: “This 1970s gem offers a witty, amoral look at desperation and the lengths people will go to maintain appearances. Segal and Fonda shine as the unlikely Bonnie and Clyde, fumbling their way through early robberies before finding a criminal groove. The film’s strength lies in its performances and its willingness to satirize everything from big business to the welfare system. It’s a breezy caper that might lack a truly sharp edge for some, but delivers consistent amusement thanks to its charismatic leads.
Audience Reactions
Viewers loved watching a relatable couple turn to crime in a funny, satirical way.: Many praised the chemistry and performances of George Segal and Jane Fonda, finding their transformation from affluent couple to amateur robbers hilarious. The film’s social commentary on unemployment and corporate greed resonated with many, and specific scenes like failed robberies or encounters with bureaucracy were frequently cited as highlights.
Overall Consensus: A generally well-liked 70s comedy that effectively blends social satire with caper hijinks, buoyed by strong, charismatic performances from George Segal and Jane Fonda, despite some dated humor.
Awards
🛠️ Behind the Scenes
- “The film was shot almost entirely on location, with only five days of the three months of principal photography taking place on a studio sound stage.”
- “Additional scenes were filmed for the broadcast television premiere on ABC, including one where Jane works at a cosmetics counter, which are often not included in modern releases.”
- “Ed McMahon, known primarily as Johnny Carson’s sidekick on ‘The Tonight Show’, received praise for his performance as the smarmy, corrupt boss, showcasing a different side of his acting abilities.”
- “The title is a satirical reference to the ‘Dick and Jane’ series of elementary reading primers, highlighting the mundane, idealized middle-class life that the characters lose.”
🖥️ How to Watch Fun with Dick and Jane?
As a classic film from the 1970s, “Fun with Dick and Jane” (1977) may be available on various digital platforms. You can often find options to rent or purchase the movie through services like Prime Video, Apple TV, Google Play, and Vudu. Check these platforms for current availability and pricing to watch this satirical comedy at home.

🎥 Similar Movies
If you enjoyed Fun with Dick and Jane, you might like these similar films:
- Fun with Dick and Jane (2005): A direct modern remake updating the premise of a financially ruined suburban couple turning to crime to maintain their lifestyle and get revenge on their former employer.
- Office Space (1999): Shares the theme of satire on corporate life and disillusioned employees turning to petty crime against their company as a form of rebellion.
- The Hot Rock (1972): Another comedic heist film from the same era starring George Segal, focusing on elaborate capers and the humorous mishaps that ensue.
- Logan Lucky (2017): Features working-class protagonists who decide to pull off a large, audacious heist out of desperation and a sense of being overlooked by the system.
- Repo Man (1984): A cult classic known for its absurdist humor, anti-establishment themes, and cynical satire of society, which might appeal to fans of ‘Fun with Dick and Jane’s’ darker comedic undertones.
🛒 Fun with Dick and Jane Related Products
- Fun with Dick and Jane (1977) Blu-ray: Own the original classic! Experience the film’s unique 70s style and performances in high definition.
- Vintage 70s Movie Poster Print: Fun with Dick and Jane: A high-quality reproduction of the original theatrical poster, capturing the film’s era and stars.
- Board Game: The Game of Life: While not directly tied, this classic board game explores the ups and downs of careers, family, and finances, offering a whimsical contrast to the Harpers’ real-life struggles.
- Book: Cinema of the 1970s: An insightful book exploring the diverse and often rebellious filmmaking landscape of the 1970s, the era that produced ‘Fun with Dick and Jane’.
🎧 Soundtrack
Fun with Dick and Jane features a captivating soundtrack that enhances the movie’s atmosphere and emotional impact. Here are some notable tracks:
You can find the complete soundtrack on Amazon Music and Apple Music.
🤨 FAQ
The original 1977 film “Fun with Dick and Jane” is typically available for digital rental or purchase on major platforms like Prime Video, Apple TV, Google Play, and Vudu. Check these services for current streaming options.
Many viewers and critics consider the original 1977 film “Fun with Dick and Jane,” starring George Segal and Jane Fonda, to be superior to the 2005 remake with Jim Carrey. The original is often praised for its sharper social satire, more subtle humor, and the strong chemistry between its lead actors, offering a distinct product of its 1970s setting.
The film serves as a social satire of the American Dream, corporate greed, and the struggles of the middle class facing unemployment and debt in the 1970s. It uses black comedy to criticize big business, the welfare system, and the pressure to maintain social status, suggesting that desperation can lead ordinary people to extraordinary measures, and highlighting perceived hypocrisy in corporate ethics versus individual crime.
The film ends with Dick and Jane successfully robbing an illegal slush fund from Dick’s former boss’s office safe during a company party. Since the money is illicit, the boss cannot report the crime, allowing Dick and Jane to get away with the theft and use the money to regain their financial stability, including Dick getting his job back at the company.
Yes, while rated PG, the film contains themes of crime and financial distress. Importantly, viewers should be aware that, as a product of the 1970s, the movie includes dated and potentially offensive humor involving racial, homophobic, and transphobic stereotypes which some modern audiences will find uncomfortable.
🔥 Bonus Content
To Kill a Mockingbird – Thug Notes Summary and Analysis
Ever wonder about the deeper meanings in classic stories, but find standard analyses a bit dry? This ‘Thug Notes’ summary of ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ breaks it down with hilarious style, making complex ideas super accessible. It’s honestly a fresh take I didn’t know I needed!
Macbeth (Shakespeare) – Thug Notes Summary and Analysis
Think Shakespeare is too complicated? ‘Thug Notes’ tackles the ambition and drama of ‘Macbeth’ with seriously clever insights and humor. It’s way more fun than your high school English class, trust me, and gives you a cool new lens on classic tragedy.
1984 (Nineteen Eighty-Four) – Thug Notes Summary and Analysis
Curious about Orwell’s ‘1984’ and how it relates to today? This ‘Thug Notes’ analysis is sharp, funny, and makes you really think about the book’s big ideas. It’s surprisingly relevant and definitely worth the watch!
✨ Rate
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.